Monthly Archives: November 2009

Teens and cellphones: Some startling statistics

 

 

by Christopher Paslay

 

Recently, Common Sense Media and Benenson Strategy Group conducted over 2,000 interviews with teenagers about their cellphone use.  Here are some of their findings:

 

          –Eight in 10 teenagers have cell phones.

 

          –In an average week, teens send 440 text messages.

 

          –110 of these text messages are sent during class.

         

          –65 percent of teens use their cellphones in the building  despite school policy.

    

          –35 percent admitted to cheating on a test at least once with their cellphone.

 

          –65 percent say they know of somebody who has cheated with a cellphone.

 

          –Only 41 percent say that cheating with a cellphone is a serious offense.       

 

Although technology is obviously here to stay, and progressive educators must find innovative ways to use this technology to their students’ benefit, I believe we are nearing critical mass when it comes to cellphones and the classroom.  Something has got to give: the cellphone or academic integrity.

 

In my opinion, cellphones in schools are going to eventually go in the direction of cellphones in cars—there will be stricter rules and regulations put in place to keep teens from abusing technology.

 

Let’s just hope principals and education policy makers come to their senses sooner rather than later.

 

11 Comments

Filed under Cell Phones

Dom Giordano’s lost touch with teaching

by Christopher Paslay

 

After reading Dom Giordano’s “Education’s 5 Big Lies” in the Daily News last week, it’s hard for me to believe that Giordano was ever a teacher to begin with.  In particular, his belief that class size has no impact on learning is quite puzzling. 

 

Giordano states in his article:  This lie says that class size is paramount in determining a child’s ability to learn.

 

The National Education Association, the teachers’ union, has often floated the notion that 15 students in a class is the highest effective number and having 30 is an impossible situation.

 

The Rand Corp. did one of the biggest studies of class size, analyzing the effects of California‘s spending $1 billion in the late ’90s to cut class size in elementary schools. They found no link between the smaller classes and improvement in test scores.

 

The major flaw in Giordano’s reasoning is that isolated standardized test scores are the sole means in which to measure a child’s progress in school.  There is a lot more to learning—especially at the elementary level—than reading and math scores. 

 

Learning is also about socialization, citizenship, conflict resolution, organizational skills, critical thinking skills, and all the other academic and behavioral competencies children need to grow into successful adults. 

 

To see if class size has an impact on learning, one needs only to ask two fundamental questions: 

 

1.  Does classroom management have an effect on learning?  It most certainly does.  Any legitimate educator who’s spent time in a classroom will tell you that you can’t teach a class that you can’t control.

 

2.  Does class size have an effect on classroom management?  Without a doubt.  You can manage 15 students much more effectively than 30.  There are less behavioral issues; there is a stronger teacher-to-student ratio; there is less time needed to produce and grade materials, so there is more time to plan for instruction; when it comes to resources, such as computers and money for field trips, you can accommodate 15 much easier than 30; and the list goes on and on.  These factors not only impact learning, but also the teacher-student relationship, and the closeness of the classroom environment. 

 

The Rand Corp. study Giordano refers to might show class size has no impact on test scores, but then again, theoretical physics can prove that an elephant can hang from a cliff with his tail tied to a daisy. 

 

Any educator with common sense knows that class size has an effect on learning.  Giordano’s claim otherwise is either an attempt at sensationalism or proof he’s lost touch with his former profession. 

 

8 Comments

Filed under Classroom Management