The Top 10 Reasons Why Philly Lacks Teachers

by Silence Dogood


 According to a story in today’s Inquirer, “District lags in filling teacher vacancies,” a month into the new school year, the Philadelphia School District had 144 unfilled teaching jobs.  This is troubling to district officials, because big urban cities like New York, Chicago and Boston all opened with no vacancies.


Teacher recruitment experts, along with district CEO Arlene Ackerman and Michael Masch, the district’s chief business officer and temporary head of human resources, have been working hard to solve this problem. 


After much analysis and investigation, the district believes the reason for the teacher vacancies lies with their hiring process (it’s too complex and not streamlined enough), and that the current teacher contract “sets up a system where some teaching candidates cannot be interviewed until two weeks before school starts.” 


PFT President Jerry Jordan denied that the contract had anything to do with hiring.  He blamed the district for their lack of organization (might Ackerman be laying the groundwork for trying to strip teacher seniority?).


Other reasons given for the teacher shortage were the turnover of district brass, a national teacher shortage in certain subjects, and a lack of recruiting.


Now that the district and the “teacher recruitment experts” have given us their opinions, allow me to cut through all their educational rhetoric and political posturing and tell the world the top 10 reasons why there are 144 vacancies in Philadelphia public schools:


10.  The Philadelphia School District is one of the lowest paying districts in the five-county Greater Philadelphia Area.


9.  The Philadelphia School District does not offer its teachers tuition reimbursement.


8.  Class sizes in Philadelphia are the highest in the State.


7.  On any given day, 12,000 Philadelphia school students skip school.


6.  Parents of Philadelphia school children rarely get in involved with their child’s education.


5.  Philadelphia school teachers get punched in the face by their students.


4.  Many neighborhoods and communities in Philadelphia are not welcoming to teachers.  


3.  When it comes to money and resources, the district is a penny wise and a pound foolish (they spend $1.8 million on the executive staff when certain schools don’t have books, counselors, music programs or libraries).


2.  The district demoralizes its teachers.


1.  The SRC is only currently offering its teachers a one-year contract.


Yes, the Philadelphia School District sounds so inviting to new teachers.  If only they could straighten out their human resource problems (and rewrite that gosh-darn teacher contract!), I’m sure there would be a line of eager, highly qualified teachers circling around 440 N. Broad Street with their resumes in their hands.

3 thoughts on “The Top 10 Reasons Why Philly Lacks Teachers

  1. I’d say that top 10 just about hit the mark. Every time I read the newspaper, it seems as if there is another article chastising, or otherwise berating the teachers or the “current contract”. These accusations are simply not accurate. In the words of Lt. Col. Oliver North, “[I] was provided with additional input that was radically different from the truth. I assisted in furthering that version.” This seems to be the new mantra against our contract. We have a formidable opponent my friends…but the power of the oppressor rests upon the submission of the people. Keep the faith!

  2. On the heels of the fine comment by Mr. Ed Olsen, I too would like to give a thumbs-up to the above blog. The PFT contract has absolutely nothing to do with the lack of teachers in Philadelphia. There are very few incentives to work here in the city (although I actually enjoy my job and have a great relationship with my students), and now the SRC is trying to take away those few incentives. They don’t offer competitive pay; or tuition reimbursement; or adequate resources or technology; or proper safety. And now they’re blaming the contract. It’s a lot of bologna, my friend. A way for the SRC to dodge the blame.

  3. Maybe it’s Arlene’s contract that is to blame? After all if a 1 year contract is good enough for the teachers, why not for the CEO? If she does a good job this year they can offer her another 1 year contract next year. That way the district doesn’t get saddled with another overpriced CEO who we can’t get rid of when they fail to do what they have promised.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s